On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:55:24AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > I understand your logic, hence why I wrote such a lengthy commit > message. However, I'm not sure I see a logical way around it. Asking > all users of MMCI to provide a not-regulator to declare that a > secondary regulator isn't available seems a little unreasonable to me.
> Is there anything else we can do? Have all the people setting up this secondary regulator explicitly declare it? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
