On Thursday 07 February 2013, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Michal Simek <mon...@monstr.eu> wrote:
> > ok. Can you please confirm with me that the same problem is also for
> > iowrite32be
> > ioread16be and ioread32be?
> >
> > This description seems to me correct for BE and LE.
> > #define ioread16be(addr) __be16_to_cpu(__raw_readw(addr))
> > #define ioread32be(addr) __be32_to_cpu(__raw_readl(addr))
> >
> > #define iowrite16be(v, addr) __raw_writew(__cpu_to_be16(v), addr)
> > #define iowrite32be(v, addr) __raw_writel(__cpu_to_be32(v), addr)
> >
> > What do you think?
>
> Looks fine to me. Arnd, Ben?
Yes, that would be better. Can you prepare a patch?
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
