Alexander Viro wrote:
> We _have_ VM pressure there. However, such loads had never been used, so
> there's no wonder that system gets unbalanced under them.
> 
> I suspect that simple replacement of goto next; with continue; in the
> fs/dcache.c::prune_dcache() may make situation seriously better.

Awesome.  With the obvious patch attached, some local ramfs problems
disappeared, and my browser and e-mail program are no longer swapped out
when doing a kernel build.

Thanks :)

-- 
Jeff Garzik       | Sam: "Mind if I drive?"
Building 1024     | Max: "Not if you don't mind me clawing at the dash
MandrakeSoft      |       and shrieking like a cheerleader."
Index: fs/dcache.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/gkernel/linux_2_4/fs/dcache.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.16
diff -u -r1.1.1.16 dcache.c
--- fs/dcache.c 2001/03/13 04:23:27     1.1.1.16
+++ fs/dcache.c 2001/04/12 06:51:56
@@ -340,7 +340,7 @@
                if (dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_REFERENCED) {
                        dentry->d_flags &= ~DCACHE_REFERENCED;
                        list_add(&dentry->d_lru, &dentry_unused);
-                       goto next;
+                       continue;
                }
                dentry_stat.nr_unused--;
 

Reply via email to