Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 08:09:19AM +0200, Rolf Eike Beer wrote: > > Meanwhile I found that there was a hardware defect on this machine. > > So if it does not happen again I will assume that this was caused by > > this. > > What hardware defect exactly? DIMMs failing...? Probably, since it looks > like the spinlock gets corrupted and the assertion fires... In any case, > it would be interesting to know for future reference.
The RAM seems fine. It looks like it is the mainboard or a harddisk. The issues have magically disappeared since 3 weeks, but I have not done any suspend2disk since then anymore. Before that I had suspended the machine on the evening and resumed when I came to work. So it's possible that there was some corrupted stuff in the image. This is the smart output I got of one disk yesterday: Vendor: /0:0:0:0 Product: User Capacity: 600,332,565,813,390,450 bytes [600 PB] Logical block size: 774843950 bytes scsiModePageOffset: response length too short, resp_len=47 offset=50 bd_len=46 >> Terminate command early due to bad response to IEC mode page A mandatory SMART command failed: exiting. To continue, add one or more '-T permissive' options. Eike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
