* H. Peter Anvin <h...@zytor.com> wrote:
> On 11/04/2013 12:11 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * H. Peter Anvin <h...@zytor.com> wrote:
> >
> >> 8192 maybe?
> >
> > Yeah, that makes more sense I guess.
> >
>
> However, I still have serious issues with crap like this because
> randconfig is basically broken. If nothing else we need to get that
> feedback to the kconfig maintainers.
The problem with that is that there are no kconfig maintainers:
KCONFIG
...
S: Odd Fixes
The kconfig code is still a hard to maintain, scarcely documented mess. It
took us almost a decade to rescue the NTP code from a similar obfuscation
trap and make it maintainable. It had the same author as the original
Kconfig code - and the Kconfig code is 10 times larger than the NTP code.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
