On Fri, 1 Nov 2013 13:55:51 +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 03:56:09PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung....@lge.com>
>>
>> The cpumode and level in struct addr_localtion was set for a sample
>> and but updated as cumulative callchains were added. This led to have
>> non-matching symbol and cpumode in the output.
>>
>> Update it accordingly based on the fact whether the map is a part of
>> the kernel or not.
[SNIP]
>> @@ -468,6 +470,27 @@ iter_next_cumulative_entry(struct add_entry_iter *iter
>> __maybe_unused,
>> if (al->sym == NULL)
>> return 0;
>>
>> + if (al->map->groups == &iter->machine->kmaps) {
>> + if (machine__is_host(iter->machine)) {
>> + al->cpumode = PERF_RECORD_MISC_KERNEL;
>> + al->level = 'k';
>> + } else {
>> + al->cpumode = PERF_RECORD_MISC_GUEST_KERNEL;
>> + al->level = 'g';
>> + }
>> + } else {
>> + if (machine__is_host(iter->machine)) {
>> + al->cpumode = PERF_RECORD_MISC_USER;
>> + al->level = '.';
>> + } else if (perf_guest) {
>> + al->cpumode = PERF_RECORD_MISC_GUEST_USER;
>> + al->level = 'u';
>> + } else {
>> + al->cpumode = PERF_RECORD_MISC_HYPERVISOR;
>> + al->level = 'H';
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>
> Looks like this is what thread__find_addr_map does as well.
> Could above code go into a function used by both places?
In fact, it does the reverse - the thread__find_addr_map() tries to find
a map group (and map) using cpumode, but it wants to know cpumode using
map (and map group).
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
