On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Davidlohr Bueso <davidl...@hp.com> wrote:
>  {
>         int lock_taken, ret, force_take = 0;
> -       u32 uval, newval, curval, vpid = task_pid_vnr(task);
> +       u32 uval, newval, uninitialized_var(curval), vpid = 
> task_pid_vnr(task);

Do you have some broken compiler? I really tend to hate this kind of
workarounds, because as mentioned, they can actually hide valid
warnings, and it seems to be due to just stupid compilers. Are we
perhaps better off trying to get people off the broken compiler
versions instead?

              Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to