This patch fixes performance regression of dbench reported by
Alex <hb...@yandex.com>.

This issue was revealed by Phoronix tests results:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_314_ssdfs&num=2

It turns out that we need to assign WRITE_SYNC to the node writes, if
fsync is triggered.

The performance numbers are like below, which is measured by Alex.
1. 355MB/s       ext4
2. 225MB/s       f2fs : WRITE for node writes
3. 525MB/s       f2fs : WRITE_SYNC for node writes

Reported-And-Tested-by: Alex <hb...@yandex.com>.
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk....@samsung.com>
---
 fs/f2fs/file.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
index 00f937e..a4cc1d6 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ int f2fs_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t 
end, int datasync)
        int ret = 0;
        bool need_cp = false;
        struct writeback_control wbc = {
-               .sync_mode = WB_SYNC_NONE,
+               .sync_mode = WB_SYNC_ALL,
                .nr_to_write = LONG_MAX,
                .for_reclaim = 0,
        };
-- 
1.8.4.474.g128a96c

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to