On 03/05/2014 12:06 AM, Alexander Holler wrote:
The driver missed an of_xlate function to translate gpio numbers
as found in the DT to the correct chip and number.

While there I've set #gpio_cells to a fixed value of 2.

I've used gpio-pxa.c as template for those changes and tested my changes
successfully on a da850 board using entries for gpio-leds in a DT. So I didn't
reinvent the wheel but just copied and tested stuff.

Thanks to Grygorii Strashko for the hint of the existing code in gpio-pxa.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Holler <hol...@ahsoftware.de>
---
  drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
index 7629b4f..79f45c4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
@@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ struct davinci_gpio_regs {

  static void __iomem *gpio_base;

+static struct davinci_gpio_controller *davinci_gpio_chips;
+static int davinci_last_gpio;
+
  static struct davinci_gpio_regs __iomem *gpio2regs(unsigned gpio)
  {
        void __iomem *ptr;
@@ -172,6 +175,24 @@ of_err:
        return NULL;
  }

+#ifdef CONFIG_OF_GPIO
+static int davinci_gpio_of_xlate(struct gpio_chip *gc,
+                            const struct of_phandle_args *gpiospec,
+                            u32 *flags)
+{
+       if (gpiospec->args[0] > davinci_last_gpio)
+               return -EINVAL;
+
+       if (gc != &davinci_gpio_chips[gpiospec->args[0] / 32].chip)
+               return -EINVAL;
+
+       if (flags)
+               *flags = gpiospec->args[1];

Just one question here - Could we use gpio_chip-dev and hence, drop
static variables (davinci_gpio_chips, davinci_last_gpio)?

The Davinci device holds davinci_gpio_platform_data
in dev->platform_data and pointer on davinci_gpio_controller array
in dev->p->driver_data.

And looks like, dev_get_platdata(gc->dev) and
dev_get_drvdata(gc->dev) can be used here.

+
+       return gpiospec->args[0] % 32;
+}
+#endif
+
  static int davinci_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  {
        int i, base;
@@ -236,6 +257,8 @@ static int davinci_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
                        chips[i].chip.ngpio = 32;


add here        chips[i].chip.dev = dev;

  #ifdef CONFIG_OF_GPIO
+               chips[i].chip.of_gpio_n_cells = 2;
+               chips[i].chip.of_xlate = davinci_gpio_of_xlate;
                chips[i].chip.of_node = dev->of_node;
  #endif
                spin_lock_init(&chips[i].lock);
@@ -251,6 +274,10 @@ static int davinci_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

        platform_set_drvdata(pdev, chips);
        davinci_gpio_irq_setup(pdev);
+
+       davinci_gpio_chips = chips;
+       davinci_last_gpio = ngpio;
+
        return 0;
  }

regards,
-grygorii


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to