Kyle Guinn wrote:
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 22:34:13 kilg...@banach.math.auburn.edu wrote:
On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, Kyle Guinn wrote:
On Tuesday 03 March 2009 18:12:33 kilg...@banach.math.auburn.edu wrote:
contents of file mr97310a.patch follow, for gspca/mr97310a.c
--------------------------------------------------------
--- mr97310a.c.old      2009-02-23 23:59:07.000000000 -0600
+++ mr97310a.c.new      2009-03-03 17:19:06.000000000 -0600
@@ -302,21 +302,9 @@ static void sd_pkt_scan(struct gspca_dev
                                        data, n);
                sd->header_read = 0;
                gspca_frame_add(gspca_dev, FIRST_PACKET, frame, NULL, 0);
-               len -= sof - data;
-               data = sof;
-       }
-       if (sd->header_read < 7) {
-               int needed;
-
-               /* skip the rest of the header */
-               needed = 7 - sd->header_read;
-               if (len <= needed) {
-                       sd->header_read += len;
-                       return;
-               }
-               data += needed;
-               len -= needed;
-               sd->header_read = 7;
+               /* keep the header, including sof marker, for coming frame */
+               len -= n;
+               data = sof - sizeof pac_sof_marker;;
        }

        gspca_frame_add(gspca_dev, INTER_PACKET, frame, data, len);
A few notes:

1.  There is an extra semicolon on that last added line.
Oops. My bifocals.

2.  sd->header_read no longer seems necessary.
This is very likely true.

3.  If the SOF marker is split over two transfers then everything falls
apart.
Are you sure about that?


Simple example: One transfer ends with FF FF 00 and the next begins with FF 96 64. pac_find_sof() returns a pointer to 64, n is set to 0, len stays the same, data now points at 3 bytes _before_ the transfer buffer, and we will most likely get undefined behavior when trying to copy the data out of the transfer buffer. Not only that, but the FF FF 00 portion of the SOF won't get copied to the frame buffer.


Good point, since we will always pass frames to userspace which start with the
sof, maybe we should just only pass the variable part of the header to 
userspace?

That sure feels like the easiest solution to me.

Regards,

Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to