Em Wed, 12 Mar 2014 13:21:41 +0100
Hans Verkuil <hverk...@xs4all.nl> escreveu:

> On 03/12/14 11:42, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Em Mon, 17 Feb 2014 10:57:29 +0100
> > Hans Verkuil <hverk...@xs4all.nl> escreveu:
> > 
> >> From: Hans Verkuil <hans.verk...@cisco.com>
> >>
> >> Add core support for matrices.
> > 
> > Again, this patch has negative values for array index.
> > 
> > I'll stop analyzing here, as it is hard to keep the mind in a
> > sane state seeing those crazy things ;)
> 
> Rather than getting bogged down in these details can you please give
> your opinion on the public API aspects. There is no point for me to
> spend time on this and then get it NACKed because you don't like the
> API itself and want something completely different.
> 
> Internal things I can change, but I'm not going to spend a second on
> that unless I know the concept stands. Otherwise it is wasted time.

Ok, what patches after 16/35 contains the API bits?

The changes I saw so far seem ok, with the adjustments I pointed.

> This is something we need to improve on with regards to our
> processes: when it comes to API enhancements you really need to be
> involved earlier or it's going to be a huge waste of everyones time
> it is gets NACked. Not to mention demotivating and frustrating for
> all concerned.

As I commented before: those complex API changes should ideally
be discussed during our mini-summits, as it allows us to better
understand the hole proposal.

-- 

Regards,
Mauro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to