Sorry, it should have been "br0" , like this : route add -host 1.2.3.4 dev br0
Regards, David -----Original Message----- From: "Mateus Interciso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: xerces8 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: linux-net@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 11:15:24 -0200 Subject: Re: Network sharing without using NAT, possible? > Actually, putting the external NIC, and pluging it in the switch was > the fastest and easy solution, I tryed the rout add -host 1.2.3.4 dev > eth1, but it didn't worked :( > On 11/22/07, xerces8 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: "xerces8" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > From: Mateus Interciso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:11:17 +0000 (UTC) > > > > > > > On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:04:40 +0000, Mateus Interciso wrote: > > > > > I've setted up the bridge normally > > > > > > > > > > ifconfig eth0 down > > > > > ifconfig eth1 down > > > > > ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 up > > > > > ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 up > > > > > brctl addbr br0 > > > > > brctl addif br0 eth0 > > > > > brctl addif br0 eth1 > > > > > brctl stp br0 on > > > > > ifconfig br0 10.100.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 up > > > > > > > > > > but I can't ping 10.100.0.1. :O > > > > > Am I missing something? > > > > > > > > > > Let me recall that the network setup now is like this: > > > > > [Internet]--->[Bridge]---->[Windows 2k3]=====[switch]====>computers > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > Mateus > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" > > > > > in > > > > > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info > > > > > at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > > > > > > > Maybe, if I explain a little more about the fisical network we have, it > > > > may be easier to understand(or find the problem) > > > > > > > > The bridge works like this > > > > |---(eth0)---|---->|---(NIC1)--| > > > > |---BRIDGE---| |---W2k3----| > > > > Internet--->|---(eth1)---| |---(NIC2)--|--->[D-Link Switch]===>LAN > > > > > > > > where NIC1 has the internet IP assigned by the ISP, and NIC2 has the > > > > internal IP 10.100.0.2, I would like to put the ip 10.100.0.1 on the > > > > bridge, so that I can access via ssh, and use internet there, so I can > > > > download ebtables to make the firewall, as well as other monithoring > > > > tools (like SNMP for instance). But when I put > > > > ifconfig br0 10.100.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 up > > > > it doesn't ping 10.100.0.2 for instance, am I missing something here? > > > > > > > > > Ah, it is simple then. > > > > > > Set the linux br0 address to some other private range, for example > > > ifconfig br0 10._101_.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 up > > > > > > Then set some routes on it: > > > to <NIC1_IP> over interface br0 > > > (if it complains about IP address mismatch, write back and we will sort > > > it out) > > > > > > Well that's it ;-) > > > > 1.) the exact syntax is : > > route add -host 1.2.3.4 dev eth1 > > (replace 1.2.3.4 with NIC1 address) > > > > 2.) this way you can access the linux box from the win server (or LAN) > > 3.) this way you can _not_ access the internet from the linux box > > it need a public IP (the simplest solution, if your ISP is cooperative; > > you just set that public IP for br0 and leave the rest as is; > > or you go into iptables jungle ...) > > > > Regards, > > David > > > > > > > > > -- > -==Zarnick==- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
