On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 17:18:43 +0100, xerces8 wrote:

> Sorry, it should have been "br0" , like this :
> 
> route add -host  1.2.3.4  dev  br0
> 
> 
> Regards,
> David
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Mateus Interciso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: xerces8
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: linux-net@vger.kernel.org
> Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 11:15:24 -0200 Subject: Re: Network sharing
> without using NAT, possible?
> 
>> Actually, putting the external NIC, and pluging it in the switch was
>> the fastest and easy solution, I tryed the rout add -host 1.2.3.4 dev
>> eth1, but it didn't worked :(
>> On 11/22/07, xerces8 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > From: "xerces8" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >
>> > > From: Mateus Interciso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007
>> > > 16:11:17 +0000 (UTC)
>> > >
>> > > > On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:04:40 +0000, Mateus Interciso wrote:
>> > > > > I've setted up the bridge normally
>> > > > >
>> > > > > ifconfig eth0 down
>> > > > > ifconfig eth1 down
>> > > > > ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 up
>> > > > > ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 up
>> > > > > brctl addbr br0
>> > > > > brctl addif br0 eth0
>> > > > > brctl addif br0 eth1
>> > > > > brctl stp br0 on
>> > > > > ifconfig br0 10.100.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
>> > > > >
>> > > > > but I can't ping 10.100.0.1. :O
>> > > > > Am I missing something?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Let me recall that the network setup now is like this:
>> > > > > [Internet]--->[Bridge]---->[Windows
>> > > > > 2k3]=====[switch]====>computers
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Thanks.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Mateus
>> > > > >
>> > > > > -
>> > > > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
>> > > > > linux-net" in the body of a message to
>> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at 
>> > > > > http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> > > >
>> > > > Maybe, if I explain a little more about the fisical network we
>> > > > have, it may be easier to understand(or find the problem)
>> > > >
>> > > > The bridge works like this
>> > > >             |---(eth0)---|---->|---(NIC1)--|
>> > > >         |---BRIDGE---|     |---W2k3----|
>> > > > Internet--->|---(eth1)---|     |---(NIC2)--|--->[D-Link
>> > > > Switch]===>LAN
>> > > >
>> > > > where NIC1 has the internet IP assigned by the ISP, and NIC2 has
>> > > > the internal IP 10.100.0.2, I would like to put the ip 10.100.0.1
>> > > > on the bridge, so that I can access via ssh, and use internet
>> > > > there, so I can download ebtables to make the firewall, as well
>> > > > as other monithoring tools (like SNMP for instance). But when I
>> > > > put ifconfig br0 10.100.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 up it doesn't
>> > > > ping 10.100.0.2 for instance, am I missing something here?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Ah, it is simple then.
>> > >
>> > > Set the linux br0 address to some other private range, for example
>> > > ifconfig br0 10._101_.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
>> > >
>> > > Then set some routes on it:
>> > > to <NIC1_IP> over interface br0
>> > > (if it complains about IP address mismatch, write back and we will
>> > > sort it out)
>> > >
>> > > Well that's it ;-)
>> >
>> > 1.) the exact syntax is :
>> > route add -host  1.2.3.4  dev  eth1
>> > (replace 1.2.3.4 with NIC1 address)
>> >
>> > 2.) this way you can access the linux box from the win server (or
>> > LAN) 3.) this way you can _not_ access the internet from the linux
>> > box it need a public IP (the simplest solution, if your ISP is
>> > cooperative; you just set that public IP for br0 and leave the rest
>> > as is; or you go into iptables jungle ...)
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > David
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> 
>> --
>> -==Zarnick==-
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info
> at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Didn't worked as well, the command worked, but not the pinging and stuff, 
but no problem, as I sayd, it's fixed with the 3rd NIC.
Thanks man

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to