> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russell King - ARM Linux [mailto:li...@arm.linux.org.uk] 
> Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2011 12:39 AM
> To: Premi, Sanjeev
> Cc: Shilimkar, Santosh; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; 
> linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; Hilman, Kevin
> Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] omap2+: pm: cpufreq: Fix 
> loops_per_jiffy calculation
> 
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 12:23:31AM +0530, Premi, Sanjeev wrote:
> > [sp] I thought we were solving a problem - but this makes it
> >      look like race for addding sign-offs - which I am not
> >      interested in.
> 
> No, it's called packaging the patch up and getting it ready, 
> putting it
> out on the list for people to test and provide Tested-by's, acked-by's
> etc.

[sp] Agree.

> 
> Would you rather people sat on fixes doing nothing with them for a
> month instead, watching broken -rc after broken -rc going by?
>
[sp] The original patch was just few hours ago... not month(s).

~sanjeev
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to