Mark Hahn wrote: > - disks are very complicated, so their failure rates are a > combination of conditional failure rates of many components. > to take a fully reductionist approach would require knowing > how each of ~1k parts responds to age, wear, temp, handling, etc. > and none of those can be assumed to be independent. those are the > "real reasons", but most can't be measured directly outside a lab > and the number of combinatorial interactions is huge.
It seems to me that the biggest problem are the 7.2k+ rpm platters themselves, especially with those heads flying closely on top of them. So, we can probably forget the rest of the ~1k non-moving parts, as they have proven to be pretty reliable, most of the time. > - factorial analysis of the data. temperature is a good > example, because both low and high temperature affect AFR, > and in ways that interact with age and/or utilization. this > is a common issue in medical studies, which are strikingly > similar in design (outcome is subject or disk dies...) there > is a well-established body of practice for factorial analysis. Agreed. We definitely need more sensors. > - recognition that the relative results are actually quite good, > even if the absolute results are not amazing. for instance, > assume we have 1k drives, and a 10% overall failure rate. using > all SMART but temp detects 64 of the 100 failures and misses 36. > essentially, the failure rate is now .036. I'm guessing that if > utilization and temperature were included, the rate would be much > lower. feedback from active testing (especially scrubbing) > and performance under the normal workload would also help. Are you saying, you are content with pre-mature disk failure, as long as there is a smart warning sign? If so, then I don't think that is enough. I think the sensors should trigger some kind of shutdown mechanism as a protective measure, when some threshold is reached. Just like the protective measure you see for CPUs to prevent meltdown. Thanks! -- Al - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
