Bart,
This has been fixed in the latest patchset:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rdma/msg18170.html
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rdma/msg18171.html
Upinder
On Dec 21, 2013, at 1:58 AM, Bart Van Assche <bvanass...@acm.org> wrote:
> On 12/17/13 17:48, Upinder Malhi wrote:
>> Few printks in usnic are called w/o a string literal.
>> Intel GCC is throwing warnings and this patch provides a fix
>> for these.
>>
>> [ ... ]
>> @@ -372,8 +372,7 @@ static void usnic_ib_undiscover_pf(struct kref *kref)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> - if (!found)
>> - WARN("Failed to remove PF %s\n", pci_name(dev));
>> + WARN(found, "Failed to remove PF %s\n", pci_name(dev));
>>
>> mutex_unlock(&usnic_ib_ibdev_list_lock);
>> }
>
> The old code printed a warning if found == 0. The new code prints a
> warning if found != 0. If this is on purpose I think this change should
> be in a separate patch.
>
> Bart.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
