Bart,
Will make available in the next upstream, once it has a chance to go through
our internal test cycle.
Regards,
Quinn Tran
-----Original Message-----
From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanass...@sandisk.com>
Date: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 4:41 PM
To: "Tran, Quinn" <quinn.t...@cavium.com>, Nicholas Bellinger
<n...@linux-iscsi.org>
Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com"
<james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com>, "Madhani, Himanshu"
<himanshu.madh...@cavium.com>, "martin.peter...@oracle.com"
<martin.peter...@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/25] qla2xxx: Remove redundant code
On Mon, 2017-05-22 at 22:14 +0000, Tran, Quinn wrote:
>
> I think an initiator could get
> really confused if it receives two responses for the same exchange.
>
> QT: I do see the window youʼre describing in the
qlt_try_to_dequeue_unknown_atios().
> Will have to follow up with another patch. This patch is not meant for
this window
> youʼve just identify.
Hello Quinn,
Has that patch been included in v2 of this series or will that patch
perhaps be
made available later?
Thanks,
Bart.
