Hello, On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 04:14:26AM +0530, Parav Pandit wrote: > Yes. I read through. I can see two changes to be made in V2 version of > this patch. > 1. rdma.resource.verb.usage and rdma.resource.verb.limit to change > respectively to, > 2. rdma.resource.verb.stat and rdma.resource.verb.max. > 3. rdma.resource.verb.failcnt indicate failure events, which I think > should go to events.
What's up with the ".resource" part? Also can't the .max file list the available resources? Why does it need a separtae list file? > I roll out new patch for events post this patch as additional feature > and remove this feature in V2. > > rdma.resource.verb.list file is unique to rdma cgroup, so I believe > this is fine. Please see above. > We will conclude whether to have rdma.resource.hw.<files> or not in > other patches. > I am in opinion to keep "resource" and "verb" or "hw" tags around to > keep it verbose enough to know what are we trying to control. What does that achieve? I feel that it's getting overengineered constantly. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html