Am Donnerstag 09 August 2007 schrieb Alan Stern:
> Oliver and Pete:
>
> Is it possible to replace all those USB_QUIRK_NO_AUTOSUSPEND entries
> for scanners with a single class-wide entry?
Which class? It would have to blanket all vendor specific devices.
This is a rather broad swipe.
> What about printers?
Just remove the autosuspend support from the driver if you really
want to do this.
> Would a USB_QUIRK_RESET_RESUME entry suffice or do we really need
> NO_AUTOSUSPEND?
Having no way to test, I am conservative. Besides, is RESET_RESUME
the right thing to do for a device driven by usbfs? It would turn close()
into an operation that can cause a reset as a side effect.
Regards
Oliver
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
