>Since there are a little number of Japanese >characters which use "walk" radical with two "dots" (i.e., >in Japan, some characters has two dots and many others has >one dot), the number of "dots" is important for Japanese. >However, they are unified. (In this case, Japanese people >kan reed iT, just giv!ng a phunNy empResion.)
But that's true for a lot of Latin fonts, too. I can read it, but it's not right. Take the ASCII section of just about any CJK font, for example, or search for grunge fonts on the web. Han ideographs merely have the issue of having alternate 'correct' forms in active use. -- Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/
