> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hal Murray <halmurray+l...@sonic.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 2:09 AM
> To: Keller, Jacob E <jacob.e.kel...@intel.com>
> Cc: Maciek Machnikowski <mac...@machnikowski.net>; Hal Murray
> <halmurray+l...@sonic.net>; linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH 2/4] Add sock servo.
>
> >> What about rcl_sock or refclock_sock? It's used in the file linked by
> Miroslav.
> > Both of those sound good to me. Slight preference to refclock_sock if its
> > not too
> long.
>
> How about SOCK?
>
> In the ntp context, we already have SHM and PPS. Both show up in the refid
> slot in packets.
>
> Just to make sure we are on the same wavelength... I'm looking for a term
> that can be used as a handle when the context is well known for things like
> "Try SOCK, it worked for me."
>
Yea. I just found "sock" on its own to be generic and not tell me anything
about what the servo did.
I don't want to get too distracted by the name though...
Thanks,
Jake
>
> --
> These are my opinions. I hate spam.
>
>
_______________________________________________
Linuxptp-devel mailing list
Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
