>>>>> "Brandon" == Brandon S Allbery KF8NH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Brandon> We support systems researchers; this leads to a real need Brandon> for one-off machines which nevertheless get our Brandon> configuration as much as possible, but with local Brandon> adjustments. The "standard model" for configuration Brandon> management, on the other hand, assumes every machine in a Brandon> given class is effectively a clone. We actually support a very similar environment. We are a DOE computer science research facility of approximately 100 full time staff + 100-150 students and collaborators. Researchers are working on everything from kernel development to system software development (me) and high-level libraries and applications. We have a support model that includes three classes of systems: - Green (the systems group built it and maintains it) - Yellow (the systems group built it and maintains it, in conjunction with user(s)) - Red (user built it, we know nothing) We found that since moving to bcfg2, we've managed to switch almost all of our red machines to yellow, and have even become agile enough to move some yellow machines to green. So this model is pretty well supported by bcfg2. Did I mention that my teeth are whiter too? More seriously though, we have gotten a real handle on our environment's configuration since deploying bcfg2, and have started to be able to provide much better software services to our users. (which directly led to the migration towards centrally supported systems) -nld _______________________________________________ lssconf-discuss mailing list lssconf-discuss@inf.ed.ac.uk http://lists.inf.ed.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/lssconf-discuss