Howard: With all due respects I sent your post along with my response to
it; see below. However; that in itself is not important. The opinions are
my own you only made a remark that spawned my remarks.
Your words: It is better to know the truth than to ruin this man's
reputation
as a good
luthier by speculation and hearsay.
----- Original Message -----
From: "howard posner" <howardpos...@ca.rr.com>
To: "Lute List >" <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 12:37 PM
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Luciano Faria
On Dec 15, 2009, at 8:52 AM, vance wood wrote:
Howard:
I think you may have intended to address your remarks to Ron rather than
me. I haven't ventured any of the opinions that you discuss below.
I am not ruining his reputation, or any of the people who have
purchased instruments from him, He has done it to himself by not
communicating and by accepting new business while these more pressing
issue are left outstanding. It is at the least unethical, and illegal.
You can say it is not fraud but you do not have to be a con man,
intentionally perpetrating a fraud to commit fraud. Just like you do
not have to be a serial murderer to commit murder, or a thief to steal.
----- Original Message ----- From: "howard posner"
<howardpos...@ca.rr.com>
To: "lute@cs.dartmouth.edu" <Lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 10:34 AM
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Luciano Faria
On Dec 15, 2009, at 1:45 AM, Ron Fletcher wrote:
It is better to know the truth than to ruin this man's reputation
as a good
luthier by speculation and hearsay.
The truth, according to several list members who say they have
personal knowledge, is that Faria is long overdue in making
instruments and is not communicating with customers whose money he
has taken. This may destroy his reputation, but is certainly not
speculation or hearsay.
--
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 4690 (20091215) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 4690 (20091215) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 4690 (20091215) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4690 (20091215) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com