On 2010-02-22, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Guenter Milde wrote: >> LyX's unicodesymbols file is more complete than inputenc's utf8 >> definitions, so this is just misleading.
> Probably yes. >> > For now, your best bet is to open View > Source, search for the >> > character (it is marked in red in the source), and remove it. >> This is by far a more useful troubleshooting hint, so please let this be >> shown instead of the obsolete one. > I'm not sure if "remove the offending char" is always advisable (it was > in the given case). I'd say "replace the offending char", which could mean remove (for "invisible" chars) or substitute with either a supported Unicode char or ERT. I'd also suggest to report the problem, if possible with a LaTeX replacement recomendation. Thanks, Günter
