>>>>> "Duncan" == Duncan Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Duncan> so X11 has grabbed Object too... Yes, that's the problem. We have a SigC::Object that is brought into global space (because some compilers do not have namespaces). However, Object is only defined for Xt and xforms does not rely on Xt. Duncan> As for people not using xforms 0.88 then start dreaming now. My xforms 0.88.1 forms.h does not have this behaviour. I see two possibilities: - people use a lyx rpm. Then they do not need to recompile and all is well. - people want to recompile. The they are smart enough to upgrade their xforms rpm. Duncan> Even if that was not true as soon as anyone does a motif Duncan> port the duplicate name gets them again, Arghh! LyX was already ported _from_ Motif, so I hope it will not go back. More seriously, when this happens, we will probably rely on namespaces anyway. And as Lars pointed out, naming a struct Object in a library is _bad_. JMarc
- Re: LyX still does not compile Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: LyX still does not compile Svante Signell
- Re: LyX still does not compile Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: LyX still does not compile Svante Signell
- Re: LyX still does not compile Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: LyX still does not compile (work... Svante Signell
- Re: LyX still does not compile ... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: LyX still does not compile ... Duncan Simpson
- Re: LyX still does not compile ... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: LyX still does not compile ... Duncan Simpson
- Re: LyX still does not compile ... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: LyX still does not compile ... Stephan Witt
- Re: LyX still does not compile ... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: LyX still does not compile Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: LyX still does not compile Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: LyX still does not compile Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: LyX still does not compile Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: LyX still does not compile Dekel Tsur
- Re: LyX still does not compile Lars Gullik Bjønnes