On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Pavel Sanda <sa...@lyx.org> wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Pavel Sanda <sa...@lyx.org> wrote: >> > Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> >> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Yihui Xie <x...@yihui.name> wrote: >> >> > I'm pretty busy at the moment. I'm wondering if Scott can do it. >> >> >> >> Sure, I can do that this weekend. Should it be done for both branch and >> >> trunk? >> > >> > Primarily for trunk, backport to branch would nice though. Pavel >> >> Currently the manuals on trunk say 2.0.x at the top. Why don't they say 2.1? > > It is usually done just before release. Few related things: > - in trunk use change tracking (again, merged before release) > - for manuals maintained by Uwe > (http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/DocumentationDevelopment#toc7), > ask for his policies ;)
OK thanks for the tips. I'm guessing it's OK to update the format in trunk when changing the manuals? I don't think anything in-depth needs to be written there about knitr in the Additional manual because knitr already has a "manual" for use with LyX. However, it is currently an example. The only thing unmanual-like about knitr.lyx is its length, but in my opinion it is sufficient as is, especially because a lot that is in the Sweave manual applies to knitr. Attached is a patch to update the Additional manual. Is it OK? Thanks, Scott
0001-Additional.lyx-references-to-knitr-Sweave-doc.patch
Description: Binary data
