On 20/04/16 17:21, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 01:32:20AM +0000, Bruce Muirhead wrote:
Hi,
I've been trying to compile rc1 with limited success.
Compilation occurs, but when tested, on existing 2.1 files and on a
new file (using src/lyx) it is not possible to insert or edit
citations. Everything else appears to work efficiently and effectively.
I suspect a configuration problem caused by an unrecognised problem
with my debian Jessie 8.1 installation on a 64 bit system, but am
reporting this just in case I am wrong, and there is some other problem.
[...]
hostname = debian
uname -m = x86_64
uname -r = 4.4.0-0.bpo.1-amd64
uname -s = Linux
uname -v = #1 SMP Debian 4.4.6-1~bpo8+1 (2016-03-20)
Hmm, seems rather Debian Stretch (testing) than Jessie (stable) to me,
Jessie is still with
uname -v = #1 SMP Debian 3.16.7-ckt20-1+deb8u4 (2016-02-29)
Anyway, I run Jessie here on an 64bits machine and I do not see any
problems with citations. Here is the result of configure :
Configuration
Host type: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Special build flags: build=prerelease warnings assertions c++11
std-regex
use-hunspell
C++ Compiler: g++ (4.9.2)
C++ Compiler flags: -Wall -Wextra -std=c++11 -g -O2
-Wno-deprecated-decl
arations
C++ Compiler user flags:
Linker flags:
Linker user flags:
Qt Frontend:
Qt version: 4.8.6
Packaging: posix
LyX binary dir: /usr/local/bin
LyX files dir: /usr/local/share/lyx-2.2.0rc1
and ldd
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffc60f4f000)
libhunspell-1.3.so.0 =>
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhunspell-1.3.so.0 (0x00007f868f8e9000)
libz.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz.so.1 (0x00007f868f6ce000)
libmagic.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmagic.so.1
(0x00007f868f4ae000)
libQtSvg.so.4 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQtSvg.so.4
(0x00007f868f256000)
libQtGui.so.4 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQtGui.so.4
(0x00007f868e566000)
libQtCore.so.4 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQtCore.so.4
(0x00007f868e077000)
libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
(0x00007f868dd6c000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x00007f868da6b000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1
(0x00007f868d855000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007f868d4aa000)
libfontconfig.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfontconfig.so.1
(0x00007f868d26d000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0
(0x00007f868d050000)
libaudio.so.2 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libaudio.so.2
(0x00007f868ce36000)
libglib-2.0.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
(0x00007f868cb27000)
libpng12.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpng12.so.0
(0x00007f868c900000)
libfreetype.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfreetype.so.6
(0x00007f868c656000)
libgobject-2.0.so.0 =>
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0 (0x00007f868c403000)
libSM.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libSM.so.6
(0x00007f868c1fb000)
libICE.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libICE.so.6
(0x00007f868bfde000)
libXrender.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXrender.so.1
(0x00007f868bdd4000)
libXext.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXext.so.6
(0x00007f868bbc2000)
libX11.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6
(0x00007f868b87f000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl.so.2 (0x00007f868b67b000)
librt.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librt.so.1 (0x00007f868b473000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f868fb3d000)
libexpat.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libexpat.so.1
(0x00007f868b24a000)
libXt.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXt.so.6
(0x00007f868afe1000)
libXau.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXau.so.6
(0x00007f868addd000)
libpcre.so.3 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcre.so.3
(0x00007f868ab6f000)
libffi.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libffi.so.6
(0x00007f868a967000)
libuuid.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libuuid.so.1
(0x00007f868a762000)
libxcb.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb.so.1
(0x00007f868a540000)
libXdmcp.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXdmcp.so.6
(0x00007f868a33b000)
All I can say is that there are no testing or unstable repositories in
my apt sources.list
I have wondered recently how 4.4.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 came to be installed,
and have not found an answer, unless it is in the backports, which
should not install automatically in any case. I always boot the standard
jessie kernel, but if the new kernel is a likely culprit, it may be best
to uninstall it? (If taht wouldn't cause me problems, of course.)
