On 01/26/2017 08:20 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 26/01/2017 à 10:54, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : >> I am not sure. The cause for 3 is that the code fails to account >> precisely for the available space on next row (because when it evaluates >> whether breaking would be a good idea. I just have to find the time to >> write a patch. > > I pushed a fix at 8491962c6bc1. Scott, I would appreciate testing if > you have time. This is eventually candidate for stable.
Let me know when you think eventually comes. Richard
