On 2017-02-20, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --]
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 06:40:26PM +0100, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote: >> Sure, but that means a lot of test to be moved to unreliable:nonstandard. Not moved but added. In contrast to "invert", adding tests to "unreliable" has no side-effect besides them getting a tag. The tag is there to tell developers that these are "optional" tests. The test suite is OK, if all reliable tests pass, i.e. if ctests -LE unreliable does not report failures. Günter
