Am Dienstag, 18. April 2017 um 00:03:47, schrieb Tommaso Cucinotta <tomm...@lyx.org> > On 17/04/2017 23:35, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > > -) or flush lyxerr on signal, and shutdown with that signal. > > in the end, it seems to me that the best is to close the application with: > > kill -SIGQUIT > > So, I removed the sleep(0.5) before kill -9, and that way tests fail. > However, turning the signal to a -SIGQUIT seems to work just fine, in that > tests succeed as expected, because in the signal handler + exit path we seem > to do the right thing (LyX.cpp). If LyX is stuck in any dialog, the signal > would still do the right thing, whilst LFUNs / minibuf commands / C-q et al. > wouldn't work. > > So, I'd be in favor of using -SIGQUIT immediately on "TestEnd" in keytest.py, > falling back to "kill -9" if LyX doesn't quit within .... 0.5 secs ? > (without adding the \Ax work-around in test cases, that should not bee needed > anymore).
It may be too early. We should know first if the previously sent keystrokes ere
processed.
But at least we could try.
> Would u see problems ?
>
> T.
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
