On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 01:11:47PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 11:04:01AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 12:01:58PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> > 
> > > On 08/02/2017 07:25 AM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 06:05:19AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > >> [[So the situation is as Richard described it:]] we can of course 
> > > >> decide to remove something before the final release.
> > > > Moreover, this last sentence means that you still want a sword of 
> > > > Damocles hanging on a feature that would have not been added without 
> > > > your interest for it.
> > > 
> > > I don't think that is entirely fair. Scott was simply echoing a remark
> > > *I* had made (I've restored something clipped), which is totally banal:
> > > We can ALWAYS decide to remove something if we feel we have to do so. I
> > > don't think that either Scott or I see any reason to do that now or
> > > expect that there will be any such reason later. I, at least, just meant
> > > to point out that deciding not to take a second vote doesn't mean we
> > > can't act later if we feel we have to do so. Obviously.
> > > 
> > > And just to be clear, the kind of reason that could possibly lead to
> > > removal of needauth, say, would NOT lie in the sorts of abstact
> > > considerations that have dominated recent discussion. Rather, it would
> > > emerge from testing, i.e., from problems encountered by users. So there
> > > is no suggestion here, either, that we should re-litigate the issue.
> > 
> > Thanks for the clarification. I just wanted to be sure this was the
> > correct interpretation. I must say that I had a hard time trying to
> > correctly interpret some decisions.
> 
> I have now committed the shell escape patch. Note that it introduces
> some string changes. It can be further refined and improved, of course.

Did a quick test and it looks good.

> Also note that I will be unavailable the next couple of days.

Thanks for the notice.

Scott

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to