Am Montag, 25. September 2017 um 14:33:04, schrieb Enrico Forestieri <for...@lyx.org> > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 09:31:45AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Le 25/09/2017 à 08:26, Stephan Witt a écrit : > > > Now I wonder if it would be better to name the utility lyxconvert. > > > It will be installed in /usr/local/bin or something like that? > > > > I was about to suggest this. And then do we want to honor version-suffix? I > > guess not, but we might end up installing several utilities with the same > > name.
I'd say yes. The problem arises with package manager if I want different
lyx-versions installed.
ATM, I have lyx2.1, lyx2.2, lyx2.3 and lyx2.4 installed without conflicts.
Cmake for debian seems (still) to be complicated in respect of creating
multiple distinct packages
needed for e.g. common lyx data.
> Indeed. Maybe a specific install target would solve this. I mean it could
> be installed only if one explicitly issues "make install-lyxconvert".
>
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
