On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 11:20:40PM +0200, Yves Bastide wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 07:17:38PM +0100, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> >
> > Do you have any idea why Michael has problems with the reLyX path detection?
>
> Hmm. Michael, I don't understand this:
> > > Can't locate reLyXmain.pl in @INC (@INC contains:
> > > /home/schmitt/Programme/lyx-1.2.0cvs-sol/bin
> > > /opt/local/perl5.004/lib/5.00502/sun4-solaris
> > > /opt/local/perl5.004/lib/5.00502
> > > /opt/local/perl5.004/lib/site_perl/5.005/sun4-solaris
> > > /opt/local/perl5.004/lib/site_perl/5.005 .) at /opt/local/bin/reLyX line 72
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Would it be a remnant of an older installation?
That is weird since the debug messages are from the cvs version.
Michael that output is funny since you say that reLyX is in
/home/schmitt/Programme/lyx-1.2.0cvs-sol/bin but the output refers to
/opt/local/bin/reLyX, as Yves pointed out.
> Apart from that, I don't see where there may be a problem, with neither
> version of perl...
Me neither, and I don't see any failure point, and I have been examined
this for a week...
> > I really, really prefer python.
> >
> > And the code is so much readble...
>
> But so much less fun... :-)
Come on, that's not true. You can overload operators, use functional
programming tools as I did in my last program. If that is not fun, used with
classes I don't know what is. ;-)
You can add a __cal__ method to a class making it a functor, and using it
everywhere a function can be used. I don't even dream it how to do it in
perl... ;-)
> And you know that Amir's code is particularly readable
Why do you think that protesting I'm still hacking reLyX code? ;-)
No only readable but also clean. Thanks, *Mr* Perl. ;-)
> --
> Yves
--
José
