On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 12:10, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 04:13:00PM +0000, John Levon wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 11:07:36AM -0500, Anand Rangarajan wrote:
> > > 2. When I type Control-M a number of times, I get a nested set of math
> > > environments. Is this the expected behavior?
> 
> Judging from the code, yes. What did you expect?

Sorry if this wasn't clear. This didn't happen before in lyx-1.2.3. So,
the change  caught me by surprise. I have a habit of typing Control-M
numerous times while thinking about an equation. Must change this
habit...must change this habit...<spanks me>..bad boy...</spanks
me>...:-)

Anand



> 
> > > I do not see this in
> > > lyx-1.2.3 compiled against xforms-1.0. I've enclosed the lyx file
> > > (testmath.lyx below) which clearly shows a nested set of environments
> > > caused by repeated typing of Control-M in the main lyx window.
> > 
> > Andre probably has some theoretical justification for this...
> 
> In theory, yes.
> 
> > > 3. In the math environment, typing \{ in lyx-1.3.0pre1 (qt-3.0.5) seems
> > > to correspond to typing { in lyx-1.2.3 (xforms-1.0). Conversely, typing
> > > { in lyx-1.3.0pre1 (qt-3.0.5) seems to correspond to typing \{ in
> > > lyx-1.2.3 (xforms-1.0).
> 
> Indeed. I was voted down on that. People argued along the lines '['
> produces '[', so '{' should produce '{'.
> 
> > > My guess is that this is a designed change and that lyx2lyx or some
> > > other converter should be run prior to switching over.
> > 
> > No idea
> 
> Certainly not. This is a purely kayboard input related thing. The stuff is
> identical in the .lyx.
> 
> > > I apologize if these are well known issues and have already been
> > > discussed to death. Also, I apologize for not cross-testing the
> > > alleged nested math environment behavior against lyx-1.3.0pre1 compiled
> > > against xforms-1.0. The compilation did not succeed.
> > 
> > they'll be the same
> 
> Hopefully.
> 
> Andre'
> 
> -- 
> Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
> will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
> 

Reply via email to