On Sat, 13 Dec 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > So far it seems clear as crystal, but looking at the enum names and
> > the strings for the user commands I get confused. Which one is
> > supposed to "define"(*) the intended behaviour of the LFUN?
>
> That's clear. LyX acts on LFUN_QUIT. "lyx-quit" is simply translated
> to LFUN_QUIT so that the core knows what to do with it.
>
> Anyway, what really _defines_ LFUN_QUIT is the block of code that is
> acted on in the switch:
duh... unless we suddenly entered a world without software bugs, how can
you say that the code defines the intended behaviour?
^^^^^^^^
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
