Bo Peng wrote:
> Also, if -geometry is going to override everything, can not we do
>
> if (geometry option present) {
> width = -1;
> height = -1;
> start(... width, height, isMaximized)
> }
>
> Bo
>
>
I also thought about this, and I also preferred it first
because then I don't have to pass an additional parameter.
But because it is a solution which uses "magic numbers"
I've switched to a more readable implementation.
When I pass (-1,-1) I have add some comments in the code,
but using "if(!geoemtryOption)" then the code is its own
documentation.
But when you prefer the (-1,-1) solution I'll change it.
Peter
