>>>>> "Thierry" == Thierry Michalowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Thierry> Hello!  I don't know even the first bit of how the Lyx code
Thierry> is organized, but this leads me to a reflexion: why is there
Thierry> no embedded interpreter (or may I have missed it?) in Lyx?
Thierry> This could be an easy - ok, maybe not _that_ easy - way to
Thierry> allow expanding the capabilities of this wonderful tool.
Thierry> Emacs is just build around this concept, which makes it so
Thierry> powerful! (I agree that it somehow interfaces with humans in
Thierry> a strange fashion, though) Just to say it...

There is no interpreter because it is not done yet. I think we will
include a small scheme implementation like SIOD in LyX 1.2.

JMarc

-- 
                +++ the lyx project user mailing list +++
                To unsubscribe from this list send mail to 
                         [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                    with the **Subject** unsubscribe.

Reply via email to