Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2017-01-20, Neal Becker wrote:
>> Guenter Milde wrote:
>>> On 2017-01-19, Neal Becker wrote:
>>>> Neal Becker wrote:
>
>>>>> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/CTAN/fonts/newtx/doc/newtxdoc.pdf
>
>>>>> The package invoked by
>>>>> \usepackage{newtxmath}
>>>>> loads the math part of the txfonts (with revised metrics and
>>>>> additional glyphs) and should be loaded after
>>>>> the text font and its encoding have been specified, as it uses the
>>>>> text font settings to define how operators,
>>>>> numbers, math accents, \mathrm, \mathbf etc. are rendered
>
>>>>> But if I select
>>>>> document/settings/fonts/Math: Times Roman (New TX)
>
>>>>> Generated TeX says:
>>>>> \documentclass[american,journal,comsoc]{IEEEtran}
>>>>> \usepackage{amsmath}
>>>>> \usepackage{newtxmath}
>>>>> \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
>>>>> \usepackage[latin9]{luainputenc}
>
>
>>>>> Is this OK?
>
>>> Leaving both "font encoding" and "Serif font" at "Default" leads to
>>> suboptimal fonts beeing used (fontenc becomes T1 and the default
>>> Computer Modern fonts are substituted by bitmap EC (or, if installed
>>> CM-Super).
>
>> What settings do you recommend?
>
>
> Sorry, I missed the IEEEtran documentclass setting. In this case, the
> class file selects a Times font and your settings are correct.
> I don't know whether the font selection is done before or after this,
> though (look into IEEEtran.cls to find out if you are curious).
>
>
> Generally, I recommend Latin Modern instead of Computer Modern if you want
> the "classic TeX fonts" and optical sizes (good looking fonts at small
> scales for indices, fractions, etc.) and newtxmath to go with Times,
> Palatino or Libertine. I also like Fourier.
...
Unfortunately if I select "Latin Modern Roman" then it seems to defeat the
newtxmath - the math symbols don't match well with the text - it looks quite
ugly. Selecting all defaults for font settings, together with using
\usepackage{newtxmath} at the end, looks good.
