-----Original Message----- From: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org [mailto:lyx-users@lists.lyx.org] On Behalf Of Guenter Milde Sent: mandag 20. mars 2017 10.16 To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org Subject: Re: Missing glyphs! Missing character: There is no , (U+2028) in font [XXX]:mode=node;s
On 2017-03-20, Bernt Lie wrote: > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: base64 --] > -----Original Message----- > From: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org [mailto:lyx-users@lists.lyx.org] On > Behalf Of jezZiFeR > Sent: søndag 19. mars 2017 16.28 > To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org > Subject: Missing glyphs! Missing character: There is no , (U+2028) in > font [XXX]:mode=node;s > I have a problem with LuaTeX / XeTeX > No matter which font I chhose, I always get the message »Missing > character: There is no (U+2028) in font [whichever]:mode=node;s«. This character is the line separator. The error message can be safely ignored. The same holds for 0x200c ZERO WIDTH NON-JOINER (a missing character has the same effect (preventing ligatures and kerning) and maybe some other nonprintable characters. I suggest an exception list for the missing-characters-warning-to-error feature. > I choose to show the output nonetheless several times, because the > error-message keeps showing. With some fonts the italics are not > displayed, in some cases the resulting PDF seems to be correct at > first sight. The fonts seem to be correctly installed. This is unrelated. ... > Not completely related, but I get a "Missing glyphs!" (two times) with > LyX 2.2.2 on Windows 10. The source of this missing glyphs are two > occurrences of BibTeX references containing the character {\AA} (I > assume this is the source – the error message showed up after I > included these references…). The latex macro \AA is translated to 212B ANGSTROM SIGN * non SI length unit (=0.1 nm) named after A. J. Ångström, Swedish physicist The Unicode standard says: * preferred representation is 00C5 00C5 LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A WITH RING ABOVE Both character look the same but some fonts only contain 00C5. You can solve this by changing \AA to \r{A} in the bibtex file or by selecting a font with 212B. Günter -- Hm. The LaTeX macro \AA *should* be translated to the Scandinavian letter Å, at least according to some LaTeX manuals I have read through the years. As in Ångström (Swedish name) or Årdal (Norwegian name). Danes tend to use Aa instead of Å, but the Danish alphabet includes Å. I tried the suggestion of replacing \AA with \r{A}. Result? * The typesetting in the bibliography is correct and the same as for when I used \AA * I still get the same missing glyphs message * Now, I cannot search for Å in JabRef -- if I use \AA, I can search for Å in JabRef. -B
