On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 17:20 +0200, Vollmer Marius (Nokia-D/Helsinki) wrote: > ext Andrew Flegg <and...@bleb.org> writes: > > > Although a unionfs solution would be a bit more further dev on Nokia's > > part, it will reduce the developer complexity and gives us a real > > world solution now. I'm sure the community would help as well, with > > patching/building/testing kernel modules (once again, Nokia should > > realise there are clever technical people in the community who could > > help design an optimal (= quick & good) solution if engaged at the > > right time). > > Yes, agreed. Let's give this unionfs thing a shot. I was previously > arguing against it, but only as a long-term solution. As a > Fremantle-only hack, it might be better than the /opt hack.
Does UnionFS support block rotation (like ubifs) for the internal flash? -Kimmo > _______________________________________________ > maemo-developers mailing list > maemo-developers@maemo.org > https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers _______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
