The current schema can be found at: http://www.ogcnetwork.net/schemas/owc/0.1.0/
..Tom > -----Original Message----- > From: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] al.org] On Behalf Of Joshua Lieberman > Sent: 05 September, 2007 1:10 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Context.RWG] layer id in OWS Context > > What, by the way, is the current schema and where can it be found? > > --Josh > > > On Sep 5, 2007, at 7:44 AM, Kralidis,Tom [Burlington] wrote: > > > > >> Tom, > >> I know we have discussed putting an id inside a <Layer> in an OWS > >> Context document before and to date I think that we have > decided not > >> to mandate it? > >> > > > > It's not in the current schema, from what I can see. > > > >> My question now is, > >> Is it ok to optionally allow an id in layers in an OWS Context > >> document? > >> Inserting an id makes it much easier to write transactions on the > >> Context. > > > > This would probably be best in AbstractResourceType. > > > > Having said this, I haven't heard much on our current schema and > > whether it's being used in OWS5 at all w.r.t. KML integration. > > > > ..Tom > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Context.rwg mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://mail.opengeospatial.org/mailman/listinfo/context.rwg > > _______________________________________________ > Context.rwg mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://mail.opengeospatial.org/mailman/listinfo/context.rwg > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ mapbuilder-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mapbuilder-devel
