Thanks, I will give WFS 2.0 a try with the AWD file.. On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 7:14 AM Jackie Ng <jumpinjac...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It may be feasible, but if WFS 2.0 introduces new operations or new > parameters for existing operations, there will be no support for them. Also > if any of these new additions are required implementations to be > conforming, that means you'll have a non-standard/non-conforming > implementation that may subtly break WFS 2.0 clients. > > The easy way to find out if it's feasible is to clone the 1.1.0 awd, tweak > the capabilities response content and see if you can get at it with a WFS > 2.0 GetCapabilities request. > > This is uncharted territory, so good luck! > > - Jackie > > You wrote: > > Hi All, > has anyone used WFS 2 with MGOS 4? > > would it be feasible to tweak the > 1.1.0.xml.awd to 2.0.xml.awd to make that happen? > > I wanted to share a layer with arcgis.com from MGOS but I got the > "Unsupported WFS version 1.1.0. Supported version: 2.0.0" only.. > > _______________________________________________ > mapguide-users mailing list > mapguide-users@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users >
_______________________________________________ mapguide-users mailing list mapguide-users@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapguide-users
