On 11/20/2010 09:04 PM, drew wrote:
So of course the wiki is a tool that is going be used, but the process of design, as is ongoing here, and then implementation via a CMS, such as Drupal or Silverstripe for that matter, is precisely a mechanism for delivery of a system that performs in the way you describe, IMO.
I do not mind about the platform. I know that when the information is on the web site it is considered official, while the same information on a wiki is not official (I can ask the press to amend a statement taken from the wiki, but I cannot ask to amend a statement taken from the web site). I assume that information visible on the web site are officially approved documents, while you can easily write on a wiki page that "this is work in progress, and should not be considered officially approved".
I do not mind what happens before the publication on the web site. I am not concerned of what happens behind the scenes, also because I am not a tech guy and most of the times I do not understand technology.
-- Italo Vignoli - The Document Foundation E-mail: italo.vign...@documentfoundation.org Mobile +39.348.5653829 - VoIP: +39.02.320621813 Skype: italovignoli - GTalk: italo.vign...@gmail.com -- E-mail to marketing+h...@libreoffice.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/marketing/ All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
