********************  POSTING RULES & NOTES  ********************
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*****************************************************************

Louis Proyect wrote

Doug Henwood has a major article in the latest Harper's on Hilary Clinton, which is behind a paywall. I'd advise one and all, at least if you are in the USA, to pick it up at the newsstand and even consider taking out a sub. I have been a Harper's subscriber since the early 80s and really value it, warts and all. It has the guts to take on the Democrats, something that the Nation is loath to do. Short of buying the issue, this summary of Doug's article is useful:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/10/19/hillary-clinton-2016_n_6011954.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------

From this Huffington summary, I would say that yes, it's good to have at least that much of the story, and it's good Henwood was able to get it out there. But it's a hit piece about the personal development of one of the power hungry. What is really needed is a succinct analysis, using method and tools that Marx bequeathed, presented in a format and story line that anyone would have to agree with, as to why "it's hard to find any political substance," and as to why we get Clintons and Bushes and Obamas and dynasties, and why she typifies a "pragmatic politician motivated more by ambition than by principle." That sort of Marxist analysis can be accessed online with some effort, but Harper's "liberal" readership, like my friends in the light left "middle class" who hold the balance of electoral sufferance, certainly isn't getting it from the sources to which they subscribe. So they end up throwing up their hands and in the towel. And go and vote again for the lesser evil. Or not. And then there's the question calling for explanation as to why anyone would any longer, with all the palpable evidence available after the disillusionment in Obama's performance, still believe in that system of parliamentary obfuscation, and every-four-year first past the post bourgeois-created and prevailing-power-serving ritual.


---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection 
is active.
http://www.avast.com
_________________________________________________________
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to