********************  POSTING RULES & NOTES  ********************
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*****************************************************************

Proyect wrote:

Given the limits imposed by the unfavourable international balance of
forces, those of us who argued that the room for manoeuvre inside the EU
was a lot narrower than the SYRIZA leadership hoped, and therefore favoured
connecting a socialist strategy to Grexit – and always made this view clear
to our SYRIZA comrades – could not, however, help but be sympathetic to the
dilemmas they faced. Not to have been would have been churlish beyond
measure, especially given the socialist left's own political weakness in
our own countries.

******************************

May heaven send us a few more churls!

Why is it so hard for those who keep rattling on about the 'unfavorable
balance of forces' to grasp that more is involved here than an error in
tactical judgment concerning the margin of maneuver in the Eurozone? How
come churls like me were able to anticipate, before negotiations even
started, as I did on this list serve, that Greece's margin of
maneuver would be close to zero? And, if Tsipras et. al. were unaware
of this at the beginning, why did they insist on clinging to the
illusion of more favorable terms after the actual negotiations
had supplied a surfeit of evidence that this wasn't in the cards? Why did
they continue to treat the Grexit option as a fate worse  than the economic
death they have now agreed to accept? There is obviously more involved here
than a misperception that can be corrected by the ever-so-polite nudgings
 of academic hangers-on, for whom anything stronger than a few faint clucks
of demur would mean banishment from the charmed circle of . The Tsipras
team did not face reality, or counsel others to do so, because they
obviously did not want to.

Any ideas as to why not? Let me offer a few. The Syriza leadership is
embedded in a petty-bourgeois social milieu of technicians, bureaucrats,
professors, doctors and lawyers who genuinely despise austerity, but
despise even more the prospect of what a Grexit would mean for
their cosmopolitan lifestyles, travel freedoms, stock portfolios and
savings accounts. The events of the last few days have shown us just how
far this layer is prepared to go in confronting the big Euro-bourgeoisie:
not very. They display the typical class ambivalence of the petty
bourgeois, usually resolved in favor of the ruling class at crunch time.

But Syriza's base is comprised of more than middle-class professionals. It
also includes many from the working-class districts who voted so
overwhelmingly against surrender. Most of these people don't own stock
portfolios; some rely on pensions that will now be brutally slashed. It
includes many young people whose career prospects have suddenly become even
dimmer than they already were.The best result one can hope for from this
debacle is a more explicit class differentiation within Syriza, and within
the Greek left in general. A working class left will also no doubt include
middle-class intellectuals who take their politics more seriously than
their status.

Jim Creegan




On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Louis Proyect via Marxism <
marxism@lists.csbs.utah.edu> wrote:

> ********************  POSTING RULES & NOTES  ********************
> #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
> #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
> #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
> *****************************************************************
>
> On 7/14/15 8:48 AM, Andrew Pollack via Marxism wrote:
>
>> None of which makes his terrible position now a complete shock, but
>> still...
>>
>
> What is so difficult to understand? Socialist Register has been a strong
> Syriza supporter from the beginning. In fact the inability of comrades to
> read what Panitch and Gindin have actually written makes me wonder if there
> is a kind of feeding frenzy at work:
>
> Given the limits imposed by the unfavourable international balance of
> forces, those of us who argued that the room for manoeuvre inside the EU
> was a lot narrower than the SYRIZA leadership hoped, and therefore favoured
> connecting a socialist strategy to Grexit – and always made this view clear
> to our SYRIZA comrades – could not, however, help but be sympathetic to the
> dilemmas they faced. Not to have been would have been churlish beyond
> measure, especially given the socialist left's own political weakness in
> our own countries.
>
> full: http://links.org.au/node/4507
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
> Set your options at:
> http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/sectarian61%40gmail.com
>
_________________________________________________________
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to