********************  POSTING RULES & NOTES  ********************
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*****************************************************************

For a different opinion, see:

http://blackagendareport.com/black_millennials_reject_duopoly

T

-----Original Message-----
>From: Clay Claiborne via Marxism <marxism@lists.csbs.utah.edu>
>Sent: Sep 6, 2016 1:59 AM
>To: Thomas F Barton <thomasfbar...@earthlink.net>
>Subject: Re: [Marxism] seeking Henry Kissinger's endorsement
>
>********************  POSTING RULES & NOTES  ********************
>#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
>#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
>#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
>*****************************************************************
>
>This is what I'm seriously trying to understand. Just as an example A.R.F.
>you give this summation:
>
> the Republicans are in a similar place as us, but for
>> different reasons: they, too, do not see "their" candidate on the ballot. I
>> think it was obvious that most of the traditional Republican Party types
>> were backing Rubio and Cruz. Now they're being expected to endorse the guy
>> who insulted them and their families, who accused the last GOP President of
>> failing to stop 9/11 (while hanging out with people who think he was in on
>> it), who mocked one of the last GOP nominees for being captured and
>> tortured by communist guerrillas in Vietnam, and who spent much of his time
>> in the orbit of the Clintons. On the other hand, they have Clinton, who
>> they and their party machine have spent decades painting as a Communist (if
>> only!).
>>
>> So I would not put too much stock into who the Republicans end up
>> endorsing, whether Clinton, Trump, Johnson or nobody. They are in panic
>> mode as their party collapses.
>
>
>And the national question doesn't enter the discussion at all. Its like the
>above is just about how white people see the election. Differences around
>McCain get mentioned, differences around the national question ignored. I
>mean why is the GOP collapsing? Doesn't the national question loom large on
>that question? How about the Brexit vote? the AfD victory? I see a growing
>white nationalist influence in all of this, but generally speaking, people
>on this list don't.   People of color don't spend 2 paragraphs on this
>election without touch on the questions of white nationalist, Trump's
>hateful message and dangerous threats. I'm trying to understand why it is
>so different here. I know you are all tired of hearing from me about it but
>I'm just trying to understand the disconnect.
>
>Regards,
>
>Clay
>

_________________________________________________________
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to