******************** POSTING RULES & NOTES ******************** #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. *****************************************************************
No, they are responsible in no small part of prolonging the problems. Read the article AND the discussion since Greenpeace is the first commentator... David Walters On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 9:01 AM, Dennis Brasky <dmozart1...@gmail.com> wrote: > I must have missed it - was Greenpeace responsible for the high radiation > levels, or is this a case of shooting the messenger? > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 9:43 AM, DW via Marxism < > marxism@lists.csbs.utah.edu> wrote: > >> >> >> A recent Greenpeace news release leads to an inescapable conclusion: that >> us Finns need to be evacuated immediately, because radiation hazards of >> living in Finland exceed those encountered in Fukushima evacuation zones. I >> therefore humbly ask Greenpeace to find a place for 5.5 million Finns, or >> at the very least for those 549 000 of us who now have to live in a >> radiated wasteland where annual radiation doses are at least two times >> higher than what Greenpeace deems “emergency radiological situation” and >> “an unacceptable radiation risk” in Japan. If possible, could we also find >> a place that’s warm and without slush? >> >> FULL: >> https://jmkorhonen.net/2017/02/22/hey-greenpeace-could-you- >> find-us-finns-a-warm-place-to-live-in/ >> >> > _________________________________________________________ Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm Set your options at: http://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com
