> I was just thinking about creating opt-jelly! :-).
> Just for fun though, as so far I have not done > anything with Jelly yet. Did you? I have only looked at the docs, but it seems to be very nice. > My thought is that a custom view type would > suffice. Wanna join forces on this? I thought about the same, and I also think that it would be pretty easy to do. Let's do two implementations: yours and mine. Then we can combine the work (the best parts from each - or just choose the better) and offer it to Jeff. I think that this way we both can learn more about Jelly and get familiar with it. The first implementation does not need to be fancy or full working, but the ground for us to start enchanging it together. What do you think? I have no questions so far as I really don't know what it is going to be, but I think that I can start writing my version today (or tomorrow). Kind Regards Aapo Laakkonen ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ [INVALID FOOTER]
