On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Arjan van de Ven <ar...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On 8/20/2010 8:51 AM, Tobias Renz wrote: >> >> Thanks already for your answers! >> >> The targeted device is like a measurement device. So It's not too >> important to have MeeGo compliance as a label. Also we would have >> an overview of all third party apps that we would let the customer install >> or offer to him. >> I guess that also 3rd party apps that would run with OpenGL in mind would >> just run damn slow. But then we would just avoid such apps for our >> customers. > > at some point you need to ask yourself... "am I still really using meego".
Is there a possibility for MeeGo adapting compliance for a different class/tier of vertical markets? Or is this a path that just shouldn't be bothered with for those of us wanting to use it (in a branded way, and working with the project to define compatibility) on platforms that the originators aren't interested in? -Matt _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list MeeGo-dev@meego.com http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
