Matt Porter wrote: > On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Wichmann, Mats D > <mats.d.wichm...@intel.com> wrote: >> meego-dev-boun...@meego.com wrote: >>> Is there a possibility for MeeGo adapting compliance for a different >>> class/tier of vertical markets? Or is this a path that just shouldn't >>> be bothered with for those of us wanting to use it (in a branded way, >>> and working with the project to define compatibility) on platforms >>> that the originators aren't interested in? >> >> It's theoretically possible, based on the claim: >> >> Compliance is profile based where a profile specifies a device category. >> Profiles are approved by the MeeGo TSG. >> >> I guess it would mean convincing the Steering Group of the value... >> >> >> (seems like this twist of the topic is more appropriate moved >> to another location per Dawn's request the other day) > > Ok, she also requested at the last TSG meeting to post followup > compliance questions to meego-dev. I'll move to -community as > the catch all.
missed that bit, in that case maybe this was the right place? _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list MeeGo-dev@meego.com http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
